Some shooters don’t pay much attention to what ammunition
they feed their pistol or revolver other than it being the right caliber. Many a new shooter incorrectly assumes that all
“factory ammo” is made to closely match some strict industry spec and therefore
will hit a target at whatever spot at which the sights are pointed when the
bang switch is jerked. Those who become more interested in handgun technique - and shooting them more proficiently - will
learn more and more about the factors, including ammo choice, that apply to
making their marksmanship efforts more accurate and thus more enjoyable.
If we were to make a mechanical contraption to hold the firearm
firmly in positon to eliminate operator error from an accuracy test, things
like the quality of the firearm design and construction, sight positioning,
weather conditions, and, of course, ammunition would be the remaining
controlling factors in obtaining the unicorn we call “tight groups”. With a
decent quality handgun that has had its sights properly regulated, ammunition
will play a much larger role in obtaining maximum accuracy than most shooters
believe.
If consistently ringing an 8” steel plate from 7 or 10 yards
is accurate enough for you, keep on buying the cheapest “plinking ammo” you can
find and disregard any further ammo education.
Believe it or not, however, 1” shot groups are attainable from most handguns
of reasonable quality at 25 yards or beyond, but only if the ammunition is up
to the task and a box of the good stuff won’t be the lowest priced package at
your favorite big box sporting goods store.
Consistency. First, each cartridge in a given group must
produce close to the same pressure and burn rate when ignited. Yes, “burn”, because gunpowder does not explode
when ignited by the primer but instead burns rapidly, completing its job of
increasing cartridge pressure at a pre-determined rate. There is a plethora of gunpowder formulations
available today and each has its own characteristics, including burn rate,
which, among other things, determines its effectiveness in a cartridge of a
given size and the shape and weight of the bullet. If a manufacturer packs its cartridge with
gunpowder “good enough” and chosen for its cost instead of one with optimal
burn characteristics, the accuracy of that cartridge will suffer. Even if the
formulation of the powder is correct, minute variances in the amount of that
powder in a given cartridge will meaningfully affect bullet trajectory.
Additionally, each bullet in a group of cartridges must be
shaped properly, weigh the same, and be made of materials which effectively
engage the rifling in the barrel; and all these factors must be very close to the
same on each bullet within a batch. “Cheap”
ammo is not likely to meet this criteria.
Hint: Quality control in the manufacturing process is expensive. Tighter QC creates more consistency but costs
more.
Powder. When gunpowder is ignited within an
ammunition cartridge it produces an increase in pressure because the bullet
holds the expanding gasses within the cartridge until it begins its travel down
the barrel, and in some cases for some of that travel. If the quantity and type
of powder and/or the size and weight of the bullet is not optimized, the
pressure will build up too quickly or too slowly. If the bullet accelerates
down the barrel at the “wrong” speed for its size and composition, it will not
properly engage the rifling grooves. This will inhibit the proper amount of
spin imparted to the bullet, which will impair its flight characteristics after
it leaves the muzzle. A bullet which leaves the muzzle at the “wrong” velocity
also will not “fly” correctly.
Bullet Shape &
Size. A great deal of attention is
paid to the shape of rifle projectiles (bullets). The longer the distance a
bullet flies from muzzle to target, the more aerodynamic it must be, but even though
not quite as critical, the relatively short range mission of handguns requires bullet
stability during flight. Never mind that a bullet at typical handgun velocities
remains airborne for only 1/13 of a second on a 25 yard range, all the
interactions of it with the barrel and atmosphere will take place during that
time and must be correct for accuracy to ensue.
Ammunition of a given caliber is usually available in
different bullet weights. Since bullet diameter is the same on various weights in
the same caliber, the length of the projectile is the variable factor among the
different weights. A heavier bullet in a given caliber will be longer. The
overall length of the cartridge will be the same, or very nearly so, meaning
simply that the heavier bullet is set deeper into the case of the cartridge
than its lighter sibling. While one might infer that a heavier (longer) bullet
will have a greater surface area on which to engage the rifling in the barrel
and lead to increased ballistic flight stability, this is only one of the
factors at play and any advantage gained from enhanced rifling engagement might
be more than offset by other factors.
Use of one bullet weight over another dictates changes in
the type and quantity of gunpowder. Failure to fully compensate for the various
bullet weights during the manufacturing process could produce ammunition quite
competent in the realms of safety and cost but less than optimal in accuracy.
During a production run of a certain caliber, for instance, a change in bullet weight
might optimally require a change of both amount and formulation of the
gunpowder. For cost purposes a manufacturer might choose to change only the
amount. Less costly but less accurate ammo would be the result.
Cartridge to Gun
Match. Certain guns are reputed to
be “ammo sensitive” in ways that affect their reliability. Even those that will
“eat everything they’re fed” will likely be more accurate with a particular
load from a specific manufacturer. To obtain maximum accuracy from a particular
gun, it's “favorite” ammo must be discovered and this usually can be found only
by trial and error. Competition marksmen typically load their own cartridges
and find, through careful testing, the optimal combination of cartridge components
which produces the most accurate cartridge for a particular gun at a particular
range.
Generally, though not always, the higher the quality of the
gun, the more tolerant it will be to ammo variations while maintaining inherent
accuracy. Conversely, a common service pistol can sometimes prove to be
extremely accurate with the “right” ammunition.
In Conclusion;
the subject of ballistics – bullet flight from ignition to target – much more complex
than most shooters realize. It is one of, if not the most important, factors in
finding that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow we refer to as “one ragged
hole.” Obviously, the best ammo will be wasted on a range mission involving a
poor shooter wielding an inferior firearm, but someone who has a decent gun and
has begun the journey toward competent marksmanship will certainly benefit from
higher quality ammo matched to his/her gun.
None of this really matters for someone who owns a handgun
or two and shoots a few rounds per year just to maintain minimal proficiency. The
more serious shooter, however, who gains a bit of knowledge will gain both
proficiency and enjoyment along the way.
With ballistics, as with all other aspects of the shooting sports,
compromise is the name of the game. “If a little bit’s good, a lot’s gotta be
better” just doesn't work well here and can be counterproductive at best and downright
unsafe at worst. Most of the issues that need compromise to produce a cartridge
that will work well in a variety of guns have been addressed by reputable
manufacturers. It is this effort to make
their product acceptable to a wide variety of guns that makes them less than
optimal for almost all of them.
Selection by the consumer of a cartridge best suited to his/her
particular gun begins when that shooter becomes more knowledgeable by testing
various loads and learning what to look for.
And finally; BE SAFE! Keep your booger hook off the bang
switch ‘till you're ready to shoot something.
Respectfully
Submitted
The Bunker
Bunch
October,
2014
As always, respectful commentary and constructive criticism is most welcome. We hope you enjoy these articles and find them useful in your evaluations.
ReplyDelete